What does Rule 3.5 specifically prohibit in communication with judges?

Rule 3.5 specifically addresses the integrity and impartiality of judicial proceedings. It prohibits any attempts to influence judges or jurors unlawfully, ensuring that the legal process remains fair and free from outside interference or bias. This rule is crucial in maintaining the rule of law, as it ensures that judges and jurors are not subjected to improper pressure or persuasion that could compromise their decision-making.

Choosing to influence judges or jurors unlawfully undermines the legal system and can lead to severe consequences both for the legal professional involved and the integrity of the judicial process itself. The focus of this rule is on protecting the fair administration of justice, as well as safeguarding the independence of the judiciary from outside influences.

Although there are various ethical concerns associated with public commentary, seeking advice, or socializing with judges, none of these activities are the primary focus of Rule 3.5. Instead, the rule makes it clear that attempts to exert unlawful influence are particularly detrimental to the orderly conduct of court proceedings, which justifies its specific prohibition in this area.