What should a lawyer not do to influence a judge or juror?

The option that indicates what a lawyer should not do to influence a judge or juror is communicating ex parte. This term refers to communication with a judge or juror outside the presence of the other parties involved in the case. Such communication is prohibited because it undermines the fairness of the judicial process. Ex parte communications can create a perception of bias and compromise the integrity of the legal proceedings.

In contrast, seeking lawful means of influence typically refers to legitimate and ethical ways to advocate for a legal position, which is acceptable as long as it adheres to the rules of professional conduct. Filing a public interest brief can also be seen as a proper avenue for a lawyer to provide the court with insights and assistance regarding the implications of a legal issue. Providing context for the case is often necessary for clarity and understanding, which aligns with a lawyer's duty to represent their client's interests effectively while maintaining ethical standards. Thus, the prohibition against ex parte communication is a critical rule designed to ensure impartiality and fairness in legal proceedings.