When can a lawyer claim financial burden as a reason for withdrawal from representation?

A lawyer can withdraw from representation due to a financial burden when it negatively impacts their ability to represent the client effectively. This principle is grounded in the Model Rules of Professional Conduct, which emphasize that a lawyer must maintain their capacity to provide competent and diligent representation. If financial pressures compromise the lawyer's ability to perform those duties or create a conflict of interest, the lawyer is justified in seeking to withdraw.

The other options do not capture the nuances of the financial burden issue. For instance, the need for a large initial financial investment may not be relevant if the lawyer can still competently represent the client. Similarly, simply suggesting a delay in payment by the client does not automatically justify withdrawal if the lawyer’s effectiveness is not compromised. Lastly, mutual agreement with the client is not a requirement for withdrawal in such circumstances; the lawyer's evaluation of their own capability to represent effectively is paramount.