When may a lawyer represent a client in a trial where they are likely to be a necessary witness?

A lawyer may represent a client in a trial where they are likely to be a necessary witness under specific circumstances outlined in the Model Rules of Professional Conduct. The correct answer is that a lawyer can take such a role if the testimony relates to legal services they rendered. This situation arises primarily because the lawyer’s expertise and direct involvement in the matter at hand can be essential in clarifying the legal context and nuances of their representation.

When a lawyer's testimony pertains directly to the legal services they provided, it is often seen as necessary for the court to understand the nuances of the case. This scenario allows the lawyer to fulfill their ethical responsibility to provide zealous representation while still adhering to the rules regarding conflicts of interest and witness testimony. The concern is that if a lawyer's testimony is needed to establish facts critical to the case, their dual role as both advocate and witness may not inherently lead to a conflict, provided the testimony directly supports their prior legal services.

Other options do not align with the primary considerations outlined in the Model Rules. For instance, if the testimony is contested, this raises concerns about the lawyer's impartiality and capability to advocate effectively, potentially requiring disqualification. Similarly, if it is not supported by all parties, this could pose ethical dilemmas